Home / NEBOSH IGC / Scenario practice / Limestone quarry reversing truck fatality

Limestone quarry reversing truck fatality

Written by Imran Qureshi (NEBOSH)

8 study tasks, 100 available practice points. 5 management-focus, 2 technical and 1 cross-unit tasks.

How to use this practice

Official assessment guidance checked November 14, 2026:

Scenario

You are a health and safety adviser who has just been appointed by Hilltop Stone (Hilltop), a limestone quarry that supplies crushed stone to cement works and road builders. Hilltop has 90 employees and about 35 contract drivers who work for haulage firms. The quarry works two shifts, with the second shift ending at midnight. A quarry manager (QM) leads the site, with a production supervisor (PS) and a maintenance supervisor (MS). Rock is blasted from the quarry face by a specialist contractor, loaded by excavators into large dump trucks, and carried to a crusher. The crushed stone travels on conveyor belts to stockpiles, where loaders fill the customers' lorries. Dust is present at the crusher and on the haul roads, and the site is noisy.

The owners have asked for a 20 per cent rise in tonnage this year, and the QM has told the supervisors that lorries must not wait. Drivers are paid by the load, and the number of loads per shift is posted at the weighbridge. Hilltop keeps figures for production and for lost time injuries, but not for near misses. The safety adviser left a year ago, and her duties were given to the MS.

The risk assessments were written when the quarry was extended five years ago. They cover blasting and the quarry face, but they do not mention the movement of vehicles around the crusher or the stockpiles. There is no traffic management plan. Vehicles and people share the same roads and the same area at the crusher, with no marked walkways and no barriers. The speed limit sign has faded, and drivers say that nobody enforces it.

Several of the dump trucks and loaders have a broken reversing alarm or no alarm at all, and the mirrors on some are cracked. Visibility from the cab of the large trucks is poor to the rear. The site has no banksmen and no rule that a driver must have a signaller when reversing in a congested area. The lighting at the crusher on the night shift is weak, and the high visibility jackets that workers wear are old and dirty.

Maintenance and cleaning workers regularly work on foot beside the conveyors and under the crusher, where spilled stone has to be cleared. There is no system that stops vehicles from entering the area when people are working there. Contract drivers get a short talk from the weighbridge clerk when they first come to the site. It is in English only, and it does not mention the rules for the crusher area or the right of way for pedestrians.

Hilltop has no site emergency plan, although the quarry is far from the nearest town. The alarm is a hand siren in the office. There is one first aid box and one trained first aider, who works on the day shift only. The nearest hospital is 45 minutes away by road. The emergency numbers are kept in the office and are out of date. The only radio is held by the QM.

The incident

At 23:10 on a Friday, near the end of the night shift, a cleaner was shovelling spilled stone from under a conveyor next to the crusher. A contract driver, in a hurry to take a last load before the end of the shift, reversed a large dump truck towards the crusher hopper. The reversing alarm of the truck had not worked for two weeks, the mirrors were cracked, and there was no banksman. The truck struck the cleaner and crushed him against the conveyor frame. The driver did not know that he had hit someone until a worker shouted. There was no first aider on the night shift, and no one knew the number of the ambulance. The ambulance reached the quarry after an hour, and the cleaner was dead on arrival. The QM says that the cleaner should have kept clear of the trucks, and asks you to report on the incident.

Supporting document 1: Vehicle and near miss log, last four months (extract)

Kept in the weighbridge office. Reviewed by: nobody recorded.

MonthEventReported byAction recorded
Month 1Reversing alarm on truck 6 not workingContract driverWork order raised. Part not ordered
Month 2Loader nearly hit a fitter at the stockpileFitterVerbal warning only
Month 2Speed sign at the crusher knocked downDriverNot replaced
Month 3Two trucks collided in the dark at the crusherDriverDamage repaired. No investigation
Month 3Cleaner asked for a barrier and a banksmanCleanerNo action
Month 4Cleaner killed by a reversing truckProduction supervisorFatal incident, under investigation
Task 1: Hazards and risk assessment

GIC1 + GIC2 cross-unit application. Related syllabus: 3.4 Assessing risk; 8.6 Safe movement of people and vehicles in the workplace.

Identify the hazards at the quarry and explain why the risk assessment arrangements at Hilltop were not suitable and sufficient. (12)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Task 2: Vehicle and pedestrian safety

GIC2 technical application. Related syllabus: 8.6 Safe movement of people and vehicles in the workplace.

Outline the controls that Hilltop should have in place to prevent a vehicle from striking a person on the site. (12)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Compare weak and stronger answer extracts for task 2

Original teaching extracts for this task, not a complete 12-point answer or an official mark scheme. No marks are awarded to these extracts. Read the task note before using the evidence.

Weak extract

The quarry needs more banksmen and high-visibility clothing. Drivers should slow down and look carefully.

Why it is weak

  • The answer relies mainly on people noticing one another instead of controlling their interaction.
  • It does not use the layout, cleaning work or night-time conditions to justify the choices.

Stronger extract with annotations

Developed point 1

People and vehicles use the same roads and crusher area without walkways or barriers. Plan effective segregation and controlled crossing/access arrangements so workers do not have to rely on drivers noticing them; high-visibility clothing is supplementary.

Why this is stronger: Uses the layout failure to justify a higher-order control, rather than starting with PPE.

Developed point 2

Cleaners work beside the conveyor and there is no system excluding vehicles while they are there. Coordinate the work so the affected area is protected from vehicle movement before cleaning begins, with the controls understood by visiting drivers.

Why this is stronger: Applies separation to the actual maintenance task and includes contractors in the communication.

Developed point 3

Night lighting is weak and some mirrors and reversing alarms are defective. Assess and restore the visibility and vehicle-safety arrangements, restricting use where safe operation cannot be demonstrated. Where reversing remains necessary, the assessed system must keep any signaller out of crush zones.

Why this is stronger: Combines site and vehicle conditions without claiming that every vehicle needs the same package of aids or a universal reversing rule.

Develop the rest of your answer

Develop other distinct points on reducing reversing, competence, appropriate traffic rules and verification, without inventing a universal quarry speed or safe separation distance.

Control principles checked November 14, 2026. These are educational explanations, not operating instructions; apply competent site-specific assessment and local duties.

Task 3: Quarry working and the control of health hazards

GIC2 technical application. Related syllabus: Element 8: General workplace issues; 7.1 Hazardous substances; 5.1 Noise.

Outline the measures that Hilltop should take to control the other hazards of the quarry, including the quarry face, dust and noise. (14)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Task 4: Safety culture and management

GIC1 management focus. Related syllabus: 3.1 Health and safety culture; 3.2 Improving health and safety culture.

Identify the indicators of a poor health and safety culture at Hilltop and outline the actions that senior management should take to improve it. (10)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Task 5: Training, contractors and communication

GIC1 management focus. Related syllabus: 1.3 Who does what in organisations; 3.2 Improving health and safety culture.

Outline the information, instruction and training that workers and contract drivers at Hilltop should receive, and how communication could be improved. (12)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Task 6: Emergency arrangements

GIC1 management focus. Related syllabus: 3.8 Emergency procedures.

Outline the emergency arrangements that Hilltop should have, with particular reference to first aid and the response to a serious injury, and explain the weaknesses that the incident showed. (14)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Task 7: Incident investigation

GIC1 management focus. Related syllabus: 4.1 Investigating and reporting incidents.

Outline the steps that Hilltop should follow when investigating this incident and give the immediate and underlying causes that the investigation would be likely to find. (14)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Task 8: The case for health and safety

GIC1 management focus. Related syllabus: 1.1 Morals and money; 1.2 Regulating health and safety.

Explain the moral, legal and financial reasons for Hilltop to improve its management of health and safety, using the incident as an example. (12)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Practice points counted across all tasks: 0 of 100. This teaching set is not a scored GIC1 mock or a GIC2 assessment.