Home / NEBOSH IGC / Scenario practice / Poultry plant ammonia release

Poultry plant ammonia release

Written by Imran Qureshi (NEBOSH)

8 study tasks, 100 available practice points. 5 management-focus, 1 technical and 2 cross-unit tasks.

How to use this practice

Official assessment guidance checked November 14, 2026:

Scenario

You are a health and safety adviser who has just been appointed by Fresh Valley Poultry (Fresh Valley), a plant that slaughters, cuts and packs chickens for supermarkets and restaurants. Fresh Valley has 260 permanent employees and uses about 70 agency workers on the processing lines. The plant works two shifts a day, six days a week. A plant manager (PM) leads the site, with a production manager (PrM) and an engineering manager (EM). Birds are hung on a moving line, killed, cut and packed in cold rooms. The plant is kept cold by an ammonia refrigeration system, with pipes running through the roof and a plant room next to the packing hall. The floors are wet for most of the day.

The owners have asked for the line speed to be raised by 15 per cent to meet a new supermarket contract. The line workers make the same cutting and packing movements thousands of times a shift, and are paid a bonus for the number of birds that they process. Several workers complain of pain in their hands, wrists and shoulders, and two have left because of this. Safety figures are not collected, and the accident book is kept in the HR office. The safety officer has left, and her duties have been given to the EM, who also manages repairs.

Fresh Valley has a safety policy that was signed by the owner when the plant was built. It names no one but the owner. The risk assessments were written seven years ago by a consultant. They cover slips and the use of knives, but do not mention manual handling, repetitive work or the refrigeration plant. Safety meetings are held every few months, but workers on the line are not invited because the line must not stop.

The ammonia plant is old. Last year a pipe in the roof space was found to be corroded and was patched with a clamp. Ammonia detectors were fitted in the plant room, but the alarm is wired to a panel that nobody watches, and two of the three detectors have been out of order for weeks. The plant room door is often propped open. Maintenance is done by the in-house fitters and by a contractor, Frost Services (Frost), who are called when something fails. There is no planned inspection of the pipes, and no written permit for work on the ammonia system. The valves are not labelled, and the drawings of the pipes are out of date.

Agency workers are supplied by Quick Staff (Quick), usually at short notice. Their induction is a 10 minute talk in English, and many speak Urdu or Pashto. They are not told about ammonia or what to do if they smell it. Protective equipment is issued if available. The supervisors have been promoted from the line without training. Workers say that if a person stops the line to report a problem, the supervisor shouts at them and they lose bonus time.

The alarm in the plant is a siren that can be heard in the packing hall but not in the roof space or the cold rooms. There has been no evacuation drill in three years. The plant has one first aid room and one first aider on the day shift. There are no first aiders on the night shift. There is no breathing apparatus for the maintenance staff, and no one is trained to use it. The muster point is in the car park beside the plant room.

The incident

At 02:10 on a Sunday, during the night shift, a Frost fitter was sent to the roof space to repair a leaking valve on the ammonia pipe. No permit was issued and the system was not isolated. When he loosened the valve, liquid ammonia sprayed from the pipe and a large cloud of gas spread through the roof space and down into the packing hall through the ceiling vents. The detectors in the plant room did not alarm, because they were out of order. Workers in the packing hall began coughing and ran in all directions, since there was no evacuation plan. Some ran towards the plant room and the car park, where the gas was thickest. Two agency workers who could not find the exit were trapped in a cold room. The fitter was badly burned and died in hospital that day. Eleven workers were treated for breathing problems and eye damage, and two of them are still on a ventilator. The PM says that the fitter should have called the supervisor before working, and asks you to report on the incident.

Supporting document 1: Refrigeration and incident log, last four months (extract)

Kept in the engineering office. Reviewed by: nobody recorded.

MonthEventReported byAction recorded
Month 1Smell of ammonia in the packing hallPacking supervisorDoors opened. No investigation
Month 2Corroded pipe found in the roof spaceFrost fitterClamp fitted. No replacement planned
Month 2Ammonia detectors 1 and 2 out of orderMaintenance fitterWork order raised. Parts not ordered
Month 3Three agency workers complained of sore eyes and coughAgency workerTold to wash their faces
Month 3Two workers off sick with wrist and shoulder painHR assistantNot entered in the accident book
Month 4Release of ammonia, one fitter dead, eleven workers treatedPlant managerFatal incident, under investigation
Task 1: Hazards and risk assessment

GIC1 + GIC2 cross-unit application. Related syllabus: 3.4 Assessing risk; 7.1 Hazardous substances.

Identify the hazards at Fresh Valley and explain why the risk assessment arrangements were not suitable and sufficient. (12)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Task 2: Ammonia refrigeration

GIC2 technical application. Related syllabus: 7.1 Hazardous substances; 7.2 Assessment of health risks; 9.1 General requirements.

Outline the controls that Fresh Valley should have in place to prevent a release of ammonia and to limit the harm if one occurs. (12)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Task 3: Maintenance, permits and contractors

GIC1 + GIC2 cross-unit application. Related syllabus: 3.7 Permit to work systems; 1.3 Who does what in organisations; 9.1 General requirements.

Describe the weaknesses in the way maintenance work and contractors were controlled at Fresh Valley, and outline how they should be improved. (14)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Compare weak and stronger answer extracts for task 3

Original teaching extracts for this task, not a complete 14-point answer or an official mark scheme. No marks are awarded to these extracts. Read the task note before using the evidence.

Weak extract

Maintenance was badly organised. The contractor should have had a permit and been supervised.

Why it is weak

  • This does not identify what needed to be controlled before the valve was opened.
  • It says nothing about inaccurate plant information or how the permit relates to physical precautions.

Stronger extract with annotations

Developed point 1

The fitter loosened a valve without isolation and liquid ammonia sprayed from the pipe. Before authorisation, competent refrigeration personnel must establish and verify a safe work condition for the specific system, including residual pressure and release risks; issuing paper permission does not achieve that.

Why this is stronger: Connects a physical failure to the purpose of controlled maintenance, without providing an ammonia depressurisation procedure.

Developed point 2

Valves are unlabelled and pipe drawings are out of date. The team cannot assume that paperwork identifies the correct section; current, verified plant information is needed to plan and communicate the actual work boundaries.

Why this is stronger: Explains why information accuracy matters to isolation rather than merely requesting better records.

Developed point 3

Maintenance is arranged when something fails, and there is no planned pipe inspection. The corroded-pipe history should inform a competent inspection and maintenance plan, with defects followed through; a clamp being fitted does not itself establish that the longer-term risk has been resolved.

Why this is stronger: Uses the history to explain preventive maintenance and avoids assuming that all clamps are automatically unsafe repairs.

Develop the rest of your answer

Continue with contractor selection, briefing, safe timing, supervision and hand-back. The roof-space location requires its own assessment; a second person alone is not a safe system.

Control principles checked November 14, 2026. These are educational explanations, not operating instructions; apply competent site-specific assessment and local duties.

Task 4: Safety culture and management

GIC1 management focus. Related syllabus: 3.1 Health and safety culture; 3.2 Improving health and safety culture.

Identify the indicators of a poor health and safety culture at Fresh Valley, and outline the actions that senior management should take to improve it. (10)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Task 5: Training, agency workers and communication

GIC1 management focus. Related syllabus: 1.3 Who does what in organisations; 3.2 Improving health and safety culture.

Outline the information, instruction and training that workers, agency workers and supervisors at Fresh Valley should receive, and how communication could be improved. (12)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Task 6: Emergency arrangements

GIC1 management focus. Related syllabus: 3.8 Emergency procedures.

Outline the emergency arrangements that Fresh Valley should have for a release of ammonia, and explain the weaknesses that the incident showed. (14)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Task 7: Incident investigation

GIC1 management focus. Related syllabus: 4.1 Investigating and reporting incidents.

Outline the steps that Fresh Valley should follow when investigating this incident and give the immediate and underlying causes that an investigation would be likely to find. (14)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Task 8: The case for health and safety

GIC1 management focus. Related syllabus: 1.1 Morals and money; 1.2 Regulating health and safety.

Explain the moral, legal and financial reasons for Fresh Valley to improve its management of health and safety, using the incident as an example. (12)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Practice points counted across all tasks: 0 of 100. This teaching set is not a scored GIC1 mock or a GIC2 assessment.