Home / NEBOSH IGC / Scenario practice / Recycling plant baler crush incident

Recycling plant baler crush incident

Written by Imran Qureshi (NEBOSH)

8 study tasks, 100 available practice points. 7 management-focus, 1 technical and 0 cross-unit tasks.

How to use this practice

Official assessment guidance checked November 14, 2026:

Scenario

You are a health and safety adviser who has just been appointed by Noor Recycling (Noor), a plant that sorts waste paper and cardboard and presses it into bales for sale to paper mills. Noor has 140 permanent employees and about 40 agency workers on two 10 hour shifts, six days a week. The plant manager (PM) leads the site. An operations manager (OM) and an engineering manager (EM) report to the PM. Material is tipped into a hopper, carried along a sorting conveyor where workers pick out plastic and metal, and then pressed by a large baler. Dust and noise levels are high, and forklift trucks move bales around the yard all day.

The owners have set a target to increase the weight of bales by a fifth this year. The PM and the OM are paid a bonus if the target is met, and sorting workers receive a small payment for each bale that their line produces. Output is displayed on a screen in the canteen every day, but there are no figures for accidents or near misses. The PM says in meetings that stops of the baler cost money and must be short, and that jams must be cleared quickly.

Noor has a one page health and safety policy that was written when the plant opened nine years ago. It does not name anyone who is responsible for any task. The only risk assessments were written by the previous manager and cover the forklift trucks and the first aid room. There is no assessment of the baler or the conveyor. The one safety officer works in the office three days a week and also deals with the payroll.

The baler has a steel hopper with an interlocked access gate. The gate should stop the baler when it is opened. Workers say that the gate often stops the machine by mistake when material presses against it, and that the maintenance team has stopped replacing the broken switches. Several operators now hold the gate switch closed with a cable tie, so the machine keeps running while the gate is open. Supervisors have seen this and have not stopped it. There is no written procedure for clearing jams, and the control panel has no lock for isolation. The yellow lines on the floor around the baler have worn away.

Agency workers are supplied by Swift Staffing (Swift). Noor asks Swift for workers at short notice, usually the day before. New agency workers have a 15 minute talk on their first day, in English only, although many of them speak Urdu or Pashto. They are not shown the machines and do not receive protective equipment until the following week. The supervisors of two sorting lines are on temporary promotion and have not been trained for the role. Safety meetings are held when there is time, and the last one was five months ago.

There are first aid boxes in the canteen and the office, and one trained first aider on the day shift. There is no first aider on the night shift. The alarm is a bell that cannot be heard in the yard when the machines are running, and there has been no evacuation drill since the plant opened. The nearest hospital is 25 minutes away by road. The PM keeps the emergency numbers in a drawer in the office.

The incident

At 14:40 on a Saturday, with a large order waiting to go out, the baler stopped because of a jam of cardboard in the hopper. An agency worker, who had been at Noor for four days, was told by his supervisor to climb in and pull out the cardboard. He had not been trained for this job. The access gate was open and the interlock was held closed with a cable tie. The baler was not isolated and nobody put a lock or a sign on the controls. A forklift driver who had not seen the agency worker went to the control panel to press the restart button so that the machine could finish the load, because the jam had cleared on the monitor screen. The ram moved forward and crushed the agency worker's chest and legs. Other workers pulled the emergency stop cord, but it was fixed too high for them to reach quickly. A colleague called an ambulance. There was no first aider on the shift. The ambulance reached the plant 45 minutes after the call, and the worker died in hospital the same evening. The PM says that the agency worker had ignored the rule not to enter the hopper, and asks you to report on the incident.

Supporting document 1: Maintenance and near miss log, last four months (extract)

Kept in the engineering office. Reviewed by: nobody recorded.

MonthEventReported byAction recorded
Month 1Hopper gate switch replaced for the third timeMaintenance fitterNone. Spare switches not ordered
Month 1Operator reached into the hopper with the baler runningLine supervisorVerbal warning only
Month 2Cable tie found on the gate switchMaintenance fitterRemoved, and found again two days later
Month 3Emergency stop cord found tied up out of reachCleanerNo action
Month 3Forklift hit a pedestrian barrier near the balerForklift driverBarrier repaired
Month 4Agency worker cut a hand on the conveyorAgency workerPlaster applied. Not entered in the accident book
Month 4Agency worker killed at the balerSupervisorFatal incident, under investigation
Task 1: Risk assessment

GIC1 management focus. Related syllabus: 3.4 Assessing risk.

Explain why the risk assessment arrangements at Noor were not suitable and sufficient, and outline the steps that Noor should take to assess the risk of the baler. (12)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Task 2: Machinery and safe systems of work

GIC2 technical application. Related syllabus: 9.1 General requirements; 9.3 Machinery hazards.

Outline the controls that Noor should have used to prevent access to the dangerous parts of the baler and to make clearing a jam safe. (12)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Compare weak and stronger answer extracts for task 2

Original teaching extracts for this task, not a complete 12-point answer or an official mark scheme. No marks are awarded to these extracts. Read the task note before using the evidence.

Weak extract

The baler needs better guards and operators need training. The machine should be made safe.

Why it is weak

  • The controls are not connected to the defeated interlock, hazardous restart or the untrained worker.
  • Made safe does not identify what has to be verified before access or return to service.

Stronger extract with annotations

Developed point 1

The gate interlock is held closed with a cable tie while the gate is open, so it is not providing its intended protection. Stop and secure the baler against use while a competent specialist restores and validates the safeguarding; simply removing the tie does not prove it works.

Why this is stronger: Identifies the failed protection and the need for verified repair, not a promise of instant stopping.

Developed point 2

The machine was not isolated and the forklift driver restarted it without seeing the worker. Jam-clearing must avoid access to the danger zone where practicable and otherwise use a competent safe system controlling all hazardous energy and movement before any authorised access.

Why this is stronger: Connects isolation and access planning to the actual restart route. It does not treat an emergency stop as isolation.

Developed point 3

The agency worker had been at Noor for four days and had not been trained for jam-clearing. Authorisation, task-specific competence and supervision must be checked before assigning that work; a general rule not to enter is insufficient when the supervisor orders entry.

Why this is stronger: Uses the contradiction between the claimed rule and the instruction, rather than blaming the new worker.

Develop the rest of your answer

Develop other distinct controls on maintenance, safe restart, access and emergency arrangements. This is technical application practice, not the format of the GIC2 workplace submission.

Control principles checked November 14, 2026. These are educational explanations, not operating instructions; apply competent site-specific assessment and local duties.

Task 3: Safety culture

GIC1 management focus. Related syllabus: 3.1 Health and safety culture; 3.2 Improving health and safety culture.

Identify the indicators of a poor health and safety culture at Noor, and outline the actions that senior management should take to improve it. (10)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Task 4: Agency workers, training and supervision

GIC1 management focus. Related syllabus: 1.3 Who does what in organisations; 3.2 Improving health and safety culture.

Outline the measures that Noor should take to protect agency workers, including induction, training, supervision and the arrangements with the staffing agency. (14)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Task 5: Monitoring

GIC1 management focus. Related syllabus: 4.1 Investigating and reporting incidents; 4.2 Active and reactive monitoring.

Describe the active and reactive monitoring that Noor should have in place and how the information should be used. (12)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Task 6: Incident investigation

GIC1 management focus. Related syllabus: 4.1 Investigating and reporting incidents.

Outline the steps that Noor should follow when investigating this incident, and give the immediate and underlying causes that an investigation would find. (14)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Task 7: Emergency arrangements

GIC1 management focus. Related syllabus: 3.8 Emergency procedures.

Outline the emergency arrangements that Noor should have, with particular reference to first aid and the response to a serious injury. (14)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Task 8: The case for health and safety

GIC1 management focus. Related syllabus: 1.1 Morals and money; 1.2 Regulating health and safety.

Explain the moral, legal and financial reasons for Noor to improve its management of health and safety, using the incident as an example. (12)

Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.

0 words

Practice points counted across all tasks: 0 of 100. This teaching set is not a scored GIC1 mock or a GIC2 assessment.