8 study tasks, 100 available practice points. 5 management-focus, 1 technical and 2 cross-unit tasks.
How to use this practice
This is original teaching material, not a NEBOSH paper or a complete mock examination. Checklist counts are this site's practice points, not an examiner's mark or a pass prediction.
GIC1 focuses on management of health and safety. Technical knowledge from Elements 5 to 11 is assessed through GIC2. Some management skills also support GIC2. Our task labels and related syllabus references are study mappings by this site, not NEBOSH approval.
GIC2 is a practical assessment of your own workplace. The technical and cross-unit written tasks here build application skills; they are not a GIC2 submission template.
For GIC1, use the task note to decide which evidence is required. Develop distinct technical points and explain why the facts matter; generic lists, repeated ideas and copied facts without explanation do not demonstrate the same understanding.
Write your answer in the box under each task. Your text stays in this browser. Afterwards, open the marking points and tick the unique points your answer made.
You are a health and safety adviser who has just been appointed by Noorani Leather (Noorani), a tannery that turns raw hides into finished leather for export. Noorani has 110 permanent employees and about 40 contract workers, and works two shifts a day, six days a week. The owner's son, the general manager (GM), runs the site with a production manager (PM) and an engineering manager (EM). Hides are soaked and limed in large drums, treated with sodium sulphide to remove hair, and then tanned with chromium salts and acids. The waste liquid from the drums runs through open drains to an underground effluent pit, where it is held before it is sent to a treatment plant next door. The tannery uses many chemicals, which are kept in bags and drums in a store near the drums.
The owner has set a target to increase exports by a quarter this year to meet a large order. The GM tells managers that delays cost money, and the PM is paid a bonus if the order is shipped on time. Production is displayed daily on a board in the canteen. There are no figures for accidents, ill health or near misses. The only safety officer left six months ago, and his duties were given to the EM, who also looks after maintenance.
Noorani has a short safety policy that was written when the plant opened and that names no person. The risk assessments are one page documents for each department, written six years ago, and they do not mention the effluent pit or the mixing of chemicals. Workers say that safety talks are held only when an inspector is expected. The tannery has safety data sheets for some of its chemicals, but they are in English, are kept in the manager's office, and most workers have never seen them.
The chemicals are stored in one room. Bags of sodium sulphide are kept on the same shelves as drums of sulphuric and formic acid, with no separation. Some labels are missing or faded, and drums are often refilled from smaller containers that carry no label. There is no ventilation in the room except for a door, and there is no eyewash. Workers use bare hands and cloth masks when mixing. A leak from an acid drum was noticed last month and was cleaned with a mop and water, with the wash going to the drain.
The effluent pit is a concrete tank, 3 metres deep, with a steel cover that is often left open. Sludge builds up in the pit and is cleared by workers who climb in with buckets two or three times a year. There is no written procedure, no gas detector, no harness and no rescue equipment. Workers are told that the pit smells bad but is safe. When acids are poured into the drains in the same shift as the sulphide liquor, a strong smell of rotten eggs rises from the pit, and several workers have complained of headaches, burning eyes and dizziness.
Many of the contract workers come from rural areas, speak Pashto or Saraiki, and are paid by the day. They are given a 10 minute talk in Urdu on the first day and shown how to use the drum controls, but they get no training on chemicals. Protective equipment is issued if there is stock, and workers pay for replacement gloves. They say that if they report a problem, they may lose the day's work. The supervisors have not been trained in the supervision of workers or in the chemicals.
The alarm is a hand bell. There has been no emergency drill since the plant opened, and no one has been told what to do in a gas release. There is no first aid room, and one first aid box in the office contains only plasters and bandages. The nearest hospital is 30 minutes away. The emergency numbers are on a notice in English that is partly torn. The only breathing apparatus on the site is one set in the office, for which no one is trained.
The incident
At 10:15 on a Thursday, during a rush to complete the export order, a worker was told by a supervisor to dump the contents of a drum of acid left over from the previous shift into the drain, to make space. The drain carried sulphide liquor from the dehairing drums to the pit. A cloud of gas rose from the open pit, where a contract worker was clearing sludge with a bucket. He collapsed. Two colleagues climbed into the pit to pull him out, without any protection, and were overcome within seconds. Other workers looked for the alarm bell but could not find it, and the call for an ambulance was delayed because nobody knew the number. The contract worker died in the pit, one of the rescuers is in hospital with damage to his lungs, and the other recovered after being pulled out by a crane driver. The GM says that the workers should not have gone into the pit and asks you to report on the incident.
Supporting document 1: Complaints and near miss log, last four months (extract)
Kept in the HR office. Reviewed by: nobody recorded.
Month
Event
Reported by
Action recorded
Month 1
Strong smell from the effluent pit, three workers with headache and dizziness
Shift supervisor
Told to open the windows
Month 2
Acid and sulphide drums found on the same shelf
Storekeeper
None
Month 2
Worker burned his hand when refilling an unlabelled drum
Contract worker
First aid with water. Not entered in the accident book
Month 3
Pit cover left open, a worker nearly fell in
Maintenance fitter
Verbal warning
Month 3
Gloves not issued for two weeks because of no stock
Contract workers
None
Month 4
Contract worker killed in the effluent pit, two workers injured
Explain why the risk assessment arrangements at Noorani were not suitable and sufficient, and outline the steps that Noorani should take to assess the risks of the chemicals and the effluent pit. (12)
Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.
0 words
Tick each point that your answer made clearly and only once. Points here are this site's own. A real examiner may accept other valid points.
Describe the weaknesses in the arrangements for work in the effluent pit and outline a safe system of work, including the use of a permit to work. (14)
Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.
0 words
Tick each point that your answer made clearly and only once. Points here are this site's own. A real examiner may accept other valid points.
Practice points counted: 0 of 14
Compare weak and stronger answer extracts for task 3
Original teaching extracts for this task, not a complete 14-point answer or an official mark scheme. No marks are awarded to these extracts. Read the task note before using the evidence.
Weak extract
The pit needs a permit and rescue equipment. Workers should wear PPE and be more careful.
Why it is weak
The response begins with equipment rather than asking whether entry can be avoided.
A permit or breathing apparatus is not proof that atmosphere, inflow, access and rescue risks are controlled.
Stronger extract with annotations
Developed point 1
Workers routinely climb into the pit with buckets to clear sludge. Assess a method that removes the need for entry from the outset; if specialist outside removal is practicable, it avoids exposing a worker to the pit atmosphere rather than relying on PPE to survive it.
Why this is stronger: Uses the recurring task to apply entry avoidance, without choosing equipment as automatically suitable.
The pit receives liquids through drains, and acid was discharged while the worker was inside. Any unavoidable entry needs competent planning of verified material/energy isolation and atmospheric precautions; a permit must record those controls, not substitute for them.
Why this is stronger: Connects the entry system to a real source of changing conditions instead of treating a gas test as the only precaution.
Two colleagues entered to help and were overcome within seconds. Suitable, practised rescue arrangements must be available before entry, with competent people and equipment fitted to the actual space; an unplanned rescue entry or a generic tripod purchase is not an adequate plan.
Why this is stronger: Uses the secondary casualties to explain rescue planning, not to teach a rescue manoeuvre.
Add points on access control, monitoring, communication, authorisation and contractor competence. This extract does not authorise entry or specify a rescue system.
Control principles checked November 14, 2026. These are educational explanations, not operating instructions; apply competent site-specific assessment and local duties.
Outline the information, instruction and training that workers and contract workers at Noorani should receive, and how communication could be improved. (12)
Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.
0 words
Tick each point that your answer made clearly and only once. Points here are this site's own. A real examiner may accept other valid points.
Outline the emergency arrangements that Noorani should have for a gas release or a chemical emergency, with particular reference to rescue and first aid, and explain the weaknesses the incident showed. (14)
Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.
0 words
Tick each point that your answer made clearly and only once. Points here are this site's own. A real examiner may accept other valid points.
Outline the steps that Noorani should follow in investigating this incident and give the immediate and underlying causes that the investigation would be likely to find. (14)
Note: You should support your answer using relevant information from the scenario.
0 words
Tick each point that your answer made clearly and only once. Points here are this site's own. A real examiner may accept other valid points.